# Jam Alternative

**A mobile-focused alternative to Jam for bug reporting.**

## Jam vs. clip.qa

| Feature | Jam | clip.qa |
|---------|-----|---------|
| Browser bugs | Excellent | No |
| Mobile bugs | Limited | Excellent |
| Network logs | Yes | No |
| Screen recording | Yes | Yes (better) |
| AI reports | No | Yes |
| No SDK needed | Yes | Yes |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |

## Key Differences

**Jam** is browser-focused. It captures clicks, network activity, console logs, and DOM state. Great for web apps.

**clip.qa** is mobile-focused. It captures screen video with optional narration. Great for iOS/Android apps.

## When to Use clip.qa

- Testing mobile apps (iOS/Android)
- Want AI-powered bug reports
- Using vibe coding (Claude, Cursor)
- Need video-based bug capture

## When to Use Jam

- Testing web apps in browsers
- Want automatic capture of all interactions
- Need network/console logs
- Building browser-based SaaS

## Complement Jam

You can use both: Jam for web testing, clip.qa for mobile testing. They're complementary.

[Try clip.qa for Mobile](/apps)