clip.qa is a mobile app that turns screen recordings into structured bug reports. Record a bug on your phone, and clip.qa's AI drafts a report with steps to reproduce and device context for you to review. Reports export as markdown for AI coding tools like Claude Code and Cursor, or to paste into any tracker. Jira, Linear, Slack, GitHub Issues and Notion integrations are coming soon. No SDK required in the app you test.

What is Vibe QA — and why does it matter?

Vibe QA is quality assurance for apps built with AI coding tools — a practice that emerged alongside vibe coding (using AI assistants like Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot to build apps rapidly). Because vibe-coded apps ship faster than traditional QA can keep up, Vibe QA uses AI-native tools to close the loop: capture bugs visually, generate LLM-ready reports automatically, and feed them back to the same AI tools that built the app. clip.qa is built for Vibe QA.

Does clip.qa work with OpenClaw projects?

Yes. clip.qa produces a structured report your agent, including OpenClaw, can read through MCP or a pasted prompt.

How is clip.qa different from Jam?

Jam has a Chrome extension, a Mac app and an iOS app, plus AI summaries and an MCP server. No Android app is documented. clip.qa records on iOS, Android and in Chrome (beta, request access), with no SDK in the app you test. clip.qa's MCP also records each fix attempt (pending, succeeded, failed) with its commit or PR, and can diff reports.

Do I need to install an SDK or add code to my app?

No. clip.qa works without any SDK integration. It uses your phone's native screen recording, so it works on any app — including competitor apps you're testing, OpenClaw projects, and apps you don't have source access to (subject to OS limits such as FLAG_SECURE).

How much does clip.qa cost?

Free: 30 bug reports and 30 AI-assisted reports a month. Team ($12.99/mo or $129/yr, billed per creator seat, viewers free): unlimited bug reports, 200 AI-assisted reports and 50 share links a month. Enterprise pricing is custom; confirm current quotas and features with sales. Audit logs and priority support are listed; SAML/SSO is coming soon.

What platforms does clip.qa support?

The clip.qa web dashboard is available now; the iOS app, Android app and Chrome extension are in beta (request access at hello@clip.qa). Bug reports can be copied as markdown into any tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues; native integrations coming soon) or used directly as prompts for Claude, Cursor, and other AI coding tools.

clip.qa / Features / Screen Recording QA

Record your screen. Get a bug report.

clip.qa converts mobile screen recordings into AI-drafted bug reports. No SDK. No templates. Record, then review the AI draft.

Try clip.qa Free

Why Video Wins

Screenshots miss context. Video captures everything.

Screenshots

A single frozen moment. No user flow. No timing. No context about what happened before or after. The developer has to imagine the rest.

Screen Recording

The full user journey — every tap, scroll, and transition. AI can extract precise steps to reproduce because it sees the complete flow, not a single frame.

3x more context than screenshots

0 follow-up questions from devs

100% of user actions captured

The clip.qa Flow

From recording to report in four steps

Open clip.qa

Launch the app on your test device.

Record Bug

Screen-record the bug in any app.

Trim

Cut to the exact bug moment.

AI Report

Structured bug report generated.

No SDK Required

Works on any app. Every time.

clip.qa records at the OS level. No SDK to install, no code to add, no configuration. If it runs on your phone, clip.qa can record it.

Your Own App

Test features as you build them. Record bugs mid-development without any integration step.

Competitor Apps

Document competitor bugs and UX patterns. No access to their codebase needed.

Client Apps

QA client builds without asking them to install an SDK. Professional bug reports from day one.

Pre-release Builds

TestFlight, internal builds, beta releases. Record bugs before they ship to users.

Video Capture Software QA

Video capture software QA: what should you compare?

Video capture software for QA should keep the recording, console output, network requests, and device context in one report. clip.qa combines those browser signals with an AI-drafted report, then gives agents structured access through an MCP server or a CLI.

How the main bug recording tools compare

Different tools cover different parts of the QA workflow. Compare what each one captures, how an agent receives the result, and how each plan is billed.

Tool	Good at	Records	AI report	MCP	Price from a primary source
clip.qa	Browser debugging with video, console, network, and device context; agent-readable reports	Chrome extension tab capture, up to 5 minutes; console and network capture	Yes	Remote server with 15 tools; CLI also available	Free: $0. Team: $12.99/month or $129/year per creator seat; viewers are free
BrowserStack Bug Capture	Screen recording inside BrowserStack's testing service	Browser extension or Web SDK widget	Not documented on the fetched pages	Not documented on the fetched pages	No standalone price; Bug Capture is included in BrowserStack Live plans. Live Freelancer: $12.50/mo billed annually ($19 month-to-month)
Jam	Browser extension, Jam for Mac and Jam for iOS capture with AI titles, summaries, and repro steps	Screen recording	Yes: title, summary, and repro steps	Available on the Free plan	Free: $0. Team: $14 per creator/month billed yearly (about $168 a year)
Luciq	Mobile observability across iOS, Android, React Native, and Flutter	Mobile bugs and feedback through a lightweight SDK	Companion groups duplicate reports and adds root-cause and repro details	MCP label listed; details not published	No public USD price; pricing is based on daily active users and seats
TestMu AI	Web and mobile test automation and device testing	Test sessions, not a confirmed bug-recording-to-report workflow	KaneAI and Kane CLI product family	MCP server listed, no description	KaneAI Starter: $17/month billed annually; a free tier includes lifetime automation minutes

clip.qa has no SDK. Its Chrome extension records a tab for up to 5 minutes and 500 MB on every plan, and it captures console output and network requests. It also records device and environment context, so the agent gets more than the screen.

The generated report includes a title, severity, issue type, detected issues, a suggested next step, a suspected root cause, and up to 30 key-moment screenshots. Video analysis runs in the cloud. Transcription can start on the phone.

Bring reports into your agent workflow

clip.qa reports are private until you share them. Shared reports and MCP output are PII-redacted.

The remote MCP server gives compatible clients access to report details, console logs, network requests, screenshots, transcripts, frame analysis, comments, and fix links. Any agent or app that can use an MCP server or run a CLI works with clip.qa today. Jira, Linear, Slack, GitHub Issues, and Notion integrations are coming soon.

Know what each option fits

clip.qa: Browser QA where the video, console, network, device context, and agent access matter together.
BrowserStack Bug Capture: Screen recording inside BrowserStack's wider web and mobile browser-testing service.
Jam: Fast browser, Mac and iOS capture with AI summaries, repro steps, and MCP access.
Luciq: Mobile observability through an SDK built into your app.
TestMu AI: Broader web and mobile test automation rather than a confirmed recording-to-bug-report workflow.

Edit Before Reporting

Trim, annotate, and redact

Not every second of a recording matters. clip.qa's built-in editor lets you trim to the exact bug moment, so the AI generates a focused, relevant report.

Recording captured sensitive data? Remove those moments before generating the report. clip.qa gives you full control over what goes into the bug report.

Trim

Cut start and end points to isolate the bug.

Annotate

Highlight the broken element or area.

Redact

Remove sensitive moments for privacy.

Export Everywhere

Send reports where your team works

clip.qa's structured bug reports work with every major issue tracker and AI coding tool.

Claude Code

Paste LLM-ready reports for instant fixes.

Cursor

Drop reports into Cursor chat for AI-powered fixes.

Clipboard

Copy structured markdown to use anywhere.

Coming soon

Jira

Copy the report as markdown into Jira today. A native Jira integration is coming soon.

Coming soon

Linear

Copy the report as markdown into Linear today. A native Linear integration is coming soon.

Coming soon

GitHub Issues

Export as markdown for GitHub Issues. A native GitHub Issues integration is coming soon.

Screen Recording QA FAQ

Can I record any app on my phone?

Yes. clip.qa uses your phone's native screen recording capability, so it works on any app — your own app, competitor apps, client apps, TestFlight builds, or any app running on your device. No SDK or special integration required.

How long can recordings be?

Recordings run up to 15 minutes in the mobile apps on Team and 5 minutes in the Chrome extension. For best results, keep recordings focused on the specific bug — usually 15-60 seconds is enough. You can always trim longer recordings down to the relevant moment using clip.qa's built-in editor.

Is my screen recording data private?

Your recordings are processed securely and are never shared or stored beyond what's needed for report generation. You can trim and redact sensitive moments before generating the report. clip.qa gives you full control over what data leaves your device.

Do I need a paid plan to generate reports from recordings?

Free: 30 bug reports and 30 AI-assisted reports a month. Team ($12.99/mo or $129/yr): unlimited bug reports, 200 AI-assisted reports and 50 share links a month.

Your next bug report starts with a recording.

Request beta access to the apps. Record a bug. Get a report. It's that simple.

Get clip.qa free How AI reports work